Rating of the university departments - 2014

To take account of the results of the main activities of university departments Educational Department "KPI" held the third consecutive year ranking university departments on the methodology approved methodical council "KPI".

The main components in determining the rating are the following directions of the department: training (A1), scientific and pedagogical potential (A2), research and innovation (A3), international activities (A4), each component part of the overall ranking with their weight ratio (A1 - 0.4, A2 - 0.25; A3 - 0.25; A4 - 0.1).

In determining component A1 Rector used the results of monitoring, state certification and external evaluation of the quality of training; A2 - ranking teaching staff (NPP) and the human resources department; A3 - scientific activity, the effectiveness of research and training of scientific personnel department; A4 - International activity Academic mobility and quality of the site of the department. In general, to determine the overall ranking uses 45 indicators of the department, received by the Educational Department of the selection committee of university, Department for Education, Institute of Education Quality Monitoring, AIS 'rating NPP ", Department of Science and Innovation, Department of International Cooperation, SIC Applied Sociology" SocioPlus "personnel department and archives, department of information.

With a view to the overall ranking of departments (training engineers and nevypuskovyh) Methodological Council decision "KPI" departments decided to set nevypuskovym average of the component A1 (training). Thus, ranking university departments for performance in 2014 was held for 129 university departments, 17 of which are nevypuskovymy.

For the second year in a row rankings were Department: Physics of metals IFB, ecobiotechnology and bioenergy FBT, management FMM. However, even provide the average value of the most important component A1 (training) did not affect the position of some outsider nevypuskovyh departments.

The results of the rating was considered at a meeting of Methodical council, which decided to recommend to the heads of departments to analyze the results of rating discuss at meetings of departments, academic councils of faculties (institutes) and up to 18 June 2014 submitted to the Educational Department proposals to improve methods of ranking units .

TN Zhelyaskova, Deputy Head of Educational Department